IndustryWeek : Locking Out Idled Threats
Home : Leadership & Strategy : Best Manufacturers : Locking Out Idled Threats


Locking Out Idled Threats

A temporary plant shutdown can leave manufacturers susceptible to risk if precautions aren't taken.

By Jonathan Katz

Nov. 18, 2009

Plant shutdowns have become an all-too-common sight since the recession began in December 2007. While shuttered plants can provide cost savings for manufacturers, the risk that goes along with operating a facility doesn't disappear. Whether it's protecting the assets that remain in the plant for later use or securing the surrounding community from potential hazards, idling operations requires careful consideration, say risk management and legal professionals.

Between 1982 and 2008, commercial and industrial property insurance company FM Global recorded 1,112 idle or vacant building losses from its clients totaling $393 million. That amounts to an average of $354,000 per loss. The top causes included fire, vandalism and weather-related damages.

1989-2008 Loss History --
Idle Vacant Buildings

Loss Costs:
percentage by peril

Fire

48%

Arson/ Vandalism/ Theft

20%

Weather

31%

Other

1%

Number of losses:
percentage by peril

Fire

24%

Arson/ Vandalism/ Theft

37%

Weather

34%

Other

5%

Source: FM Global

Manufacturers can help shield themselves from such human and natural threats by undertaking a thorough risk-assessment process, says Tom Delorie, the Midwest zonal leader for Marsh Risk Consulting's property risk practice. He recommends involving multiple divisions within a business operation in the process to ensure all potential risk factors are covered.

"It should be a multisiloed approach," he says. "It should not just be risk management or just operational. It should be a confluence of all those things because each one of those groups will have an expectation of what should be done."

The team should include someone from the operational side who is most familiar with the building, he says. In addition, it might be necessary to contact a consultant or the insurance carrier to ensure the company is meeting the requirements of its insurance policy.

"Not every insurance policy will continue to stay in force at the same level as it did before if the property is no longer running as an operating facility," says Jeff Beauman, vice president and all-risk underwriting manager at FM Global. "In other words, when the insurance was purchased, it was presented as an operating facility that was fully manned. Now you're down to a basic shell of a structure where you're going to have a security force and not the same level of individuals present."

Legal professionals can provide advice on any potential agreements or liability concerns. Aside from the obvious issues, such as rent, an attorney may review energy agreements that require certain minimum consumption obligations or municipal rules and contract covenants, says Mark Aiello, a partner at Foley & Lardner LLP and member of the firm's automotive industry team and construction practice.

When conducting an assessment, some of the common areas manufacturers should review before a shutdown include potential weaknesses in the site layout, security gaps and heating requirements in the winter. "One of the single largest cost factors when you think about an idled location is that of heating, so if it is a sprinkler property, for example, you can't just arbitrarily shut the heat off because the pipes can burst and you can have water damage," Delorie says.

Displaying 1 of 2
Page:<< Back ยท Next >>
View article on one page
Spotlight

Klein Steel Rewards Values in Action

By Jill Jusko
Company's employee recognition program keeps firm's core values front and center.

Read Full Story
Click here to learn more
Also on IndustryWeek.com

New White Papers

More White Papers »

Poll
In a recent article for IndustryWeek.com, Michael Newkirk asks: "Is manufacturing dead in America?" What do you think?



Comment in the IW Forums.