Core Competencies: The Road to Innovation Ruin

April 13, 2010
Does this sound like your mode of operation? Step 1 - Invest blood, sweat, tears and money to innovate a product or service Step 2 - Sell it through the largest distributor possible Step 3 - Maximize the volume of sales through that distributor And then ...

Does this sound like your mode of operation?

Step 1 - Invest blood, sweat, tears and money to innovate a product or service
Step 2 - Sell it through the largest distributor possible
Step 3 - Maximize the volume of sales through that distributor

And then simultaneously deal with:
- cost-cutting demands
- export capital
- quality control
- pollution.

All of this only to lose money; begin to develop a new innovation; and then start all over again.

Well it seems for a lot of manufacturers this is the case. This dysfunction can be traced to the 1980's when fears were rising in America about the seemingly unstoppable rise of Japanese companies.

Well meaning business gurus offered a long list of possible solutions. Organizational transformation emphasizing things like resources, capabilities, innovation, technology, and operational effectiveness was preached from the highest heights as the way to beat back the Japanese threat.

This new thinking was called Core Competence Theory.

C.K. Prahaldad and Gary Hamel explained the theory which requires a company to be built around a core of shared competencies (READ: those parts of the business that bring value to customers and the corporation). Taken to its logical conclusion, those business activities and functions which don't bring value should be outsourced. For example, why have an in-house payroll department or an exclusive dealer network if, instead, we can outsource those tasks, so we can dedicate more attention to innovating new products and services?

Over the next twenty years Core Competence Theory became a mainstay. And to quote Yogi Berra: "In theory, there is no difference between practice and theory; in practice, there is a BIG difference."

This is where Sam Walton comes in. He and a raft of imitators stepped up to fill the power vacuum that the strategy gurus helped to create. The result was the evolution of massive distributors, which ultimately drove the sales and distribution of innovative products and services and turned innovations into commodities almost overnight.

As we look at thousands, literally tens of thousands of innovative companies, we see that they are stuck having little or no control over the distribution and sale of their products and services. They do not even have control over the prices that they can charge for those innovations. It is all outsourced.

Is anyone noticing what is happening?

Is it too late?

Popular Sponsored Recommendations

Empowering the Modern Workforce: The Power of Connected Worker Technologies

March 1, 2024
Explore real-world strategies to boost worker safety, collaboration, training, and productivity in manufacturing. Emphasizing Industry 4.0, we'll discuss digitalization and automation...

3 Best Practices to Create a Product-Centric Competitive Advantage with PRO.FILE PLM

Jan. 25, 2024
Gain insight on best practices and strategies you need to accelerate engineering change management and reduce time to market. Register now for your opportunity to accelerate your...

Transformative Capabilities for XaaS Models in Manufacturing

Feb. 14, 2024
The manufacturing sector is undergoing a pivotal shift toward "servitization," or enhancing product offerings with services and embracing a subscription model. This transition...

Shifting Your Business from Products to Service-Based Business Models: Generating Predictable Revenues

Oct. 27, 2023
Executive summary on a recent IndustryWeek-hosted webinar sponsored by SAP

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!