Manufacturing Savvy

Let's Keep the Promise to Create 1 Million New Manufacturing Jobs, Says Industry Group

In preparation for President Obama’s State of the Union speech on Feb. 12 Scott Paul, president of the Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM), wants to make sure that the President keeps his promise to create 1 million new manufacturing jobs in his second term.

In a letter to the President he suggested some policy measures that would do the trick.

Here is a sampling of a few.

Enforcing Our Trade Agreements

  • Keep our trade laws strong and strictly enforced. Refocus the trade agenda by giving American businesses new tools to counter currency manipulation, industrial subsidies, intellectual property theft, and barriers to market access by our trading partners.
  • Ensure that the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership includes measures to prohibit trade-distorting currency manipulation and the market-distorting impacts of state-owned enterprises.
  • Convene a multilateral meeting to address global imbalances and, in particular, China’s mercantilism. If China doesn't agree to participate, designate it a currency manipulator. China ships more than one-quarter of its exports to the U.S. and finances less than 10% of our public debt, so we have more leverage than some might suggest. As your Administration works to double American exports, ensure that trade deficit reduction receives a higher priority. Lowering the trade deficit and creating manufacturing jobs will have a positive impact on federal revenues and will reduce the federal budget deficit.

Keeping it American-made

  • Apply "Buy America" provisions to all federal procurement and to federal-aid infrastructure projects that benefit from Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars. Doing so will ensure that tax dollars are reinvested within our economy and that American jobs are created.
  • Direct the Department of Defense to leverage existing procurement to contractors that commit to increasing their domestic content of our military equipment, technology, and supplies. This should commence with a top-to-bottom assessment of our defense industrial base to identify potential vulnerabilities or gaps where production of critical items and materials are at risk of no longer being sourced domestically.

Promoting Domestic Manufacturing

  • Reshape the tax code in a revenue-neutral way to provide incentives for job creation and inward investment. Research and development tax credits should help firms that not only innovate in America, but also make their products here. We should lower tax rates for manufacturing activity in America and expand up-front expensing for plant and equipment purchases.
  • Devote additional educational investment to rebuilding our vocational and technical skills programs, which would address potential shortages of qualified workers needed in the manufacturing sector.

To read about the entire 13-point plan click here.

To read the full letter click here.

Discuss this Blog Entry 1

jmzimmermann
on Feb 8, 2013

Missed the KEY way to promote domestic manufacuring...Local Content Rules. A major thing we, as a country (not just companies as people) have to "sell" is our market. Why should we allow companies...whoever owns them...to SELL here and take PROFITS from here...if they don't also provide jobs for our citizens.

China does it in spades, as do others. The USA required "local manufacturing" inadvertently in the '70's for Japanese cars. We limited the number of cars they could import. The Japanese manufacturers took a chance on "poor" US workers, and built plants here.

The result? Right now, Japanese, Korean, European car companies make more cars here than "American" car companies do. Now...let's also require the AMERICAN car companies to make more cars here.

Win-win for both, local jobs for US CITIZENS (the real "people") and profits for the companies.

Please or Register to post comments.

What's Manufacturing Savvy?

Find ideas, information, analysis and the best practice strategies that show how successful manufacturers leverage location to gain a competitive edge

Blog Archive
Subscribe to IW Newsletters

This would be valid if only colleagues could interact. I have seen many workplaces in large organizations where only management can interact. All infomation must flow through managers. To make it worse the work layout does not support interactions. ... If you want the benefits of co-location you have to have the right management structure and the right physical structure!!!

on Feb. 26, 2013
IW Marketplace - Buy a Link Now