The World Learned From BP's Mistakes -- Why Didn't BP?

Oct. 14, 2010
Tom Davenport has led research centers at Accenture, Ernst & Young, and McKinsey, and now writes about productivity, process and knowledge management for the Harvard Business Review. So when he weighs in with an "after-disaster review" concerning the BP ...

Tom Davenport has led research centers at Accenture, Ernst & Young, and McKinsey, and now writes about productivity, process and knowledge management for the Harvard Business Review.

So when he weighs in with an "after-disaster review" concerning the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, it's worth taking a hard look at his conclusions.

According to Davenport, in the 1990s, the much-maligned BP was considered to be ahead of the management curve because of an unrelenting focus on organizational knowledge-sharing and learning.

"BP was all the rage in management circles, in part because it was one of the very first firms to take the notion of 'knowledge management' seriously. John Browne, its then-new managing director, was . . .both enthusiastic and alert about what changes might allow his people to make better decisions based on insight and experience BP had already gained, and to keep building those stores."

By the early 2000s, however, things had changed -- KM as an organizational discipline had been scrapped, and a series of disasters (the Texas City refinery explosion in 2005, the Toledo refinery explosion in 2006, and the Alaskan pipeline rupture in 2006) not only confirmed the true costs of this cost-cutting behavior, but set up a situation in which BP was unable to learn from its own mistakes:

"A series of lesser disasters with no systemic and widely understood learning taking place enabled more and greater disasters. The lanes were widened for what risks were permissible without punishment; rewards were primarily for cost-cutting and not withdrawn for risky behaviors."

(Incidentally, the lack of withdrawal of rewards for risky behaviors was also a prime driver of the global financial crisis.)

As Davenport describes it, in the new BP, "the parameters of decision-making were set up to reflect the emphasis on short-term costs and benefits". This short-term focus meant that the same mistakes could be repeated without teaching BP anything as an organization, casting the die for more disasters to come.

Popular Sponsored Recommendations

Empowering the Modern Workforce: The Power of Connected Worker Technologies

March 1, 2024
Explore real-world strategies to boost worker safety, collaboration, training, and productivity in manufacturing. Emphasizing Industry 4.0, we'll discuss digitalization and automation...

3 Best Practices to Create a Product-Centric Competitive Advantage with PRO.FILE PLM

Jan. 25, 2024
Gain insight on best practices and strategies you need to accelerate engineering change management and reduce time to market. Register now for your opportunity to accelerate your...

Transformative Capabilities for XaaS Models in Manufacturing

Feb. 14, 2024
The manufacturing sector is undergoing a pivotal shift toward "servitization," or enhancing product offerings with services and embracing a subscription model. This transition...

Shifting Your Business from Products to Service-Based Business Models: Generating Predictable Revenues

Oct. 27, 2023
Executive summary on a recent IndustryWeek-hosted webinar sponsored by SAP

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!