Copyright Spencer Platt, Getty Images
Industryweek 12533 Pfizer Logo G Spencerplatt
Industryweek 12533 Pfizer Logo G Spencerplatt
Industryweek 12533 Pfizer Logo G Spencerplatt
Industryweek 12533 Pfizer Logo G Spencerplatt
Industryweek 12533 Pfizer Logo G Spencerplatt

Pfizer, Flynn Get Record Fine for 2,600% Price Increase on Drug

Dec. 7, 2016
Pfizer said that it “refutes” the findings of the regulator. Both companies said they will appeal.

Pfizer Inc. (IW 500/22) and Flynn Pharma Ltd. were fined a record amount for abusing their dominant position in the U.K. by charging unfair prices for unbranded versions of the Epanutin anti-epilepsy drug.

The Competition and Markets Authority fined Pfizer 84.2 million pounds (US$106 million) and Flynn Pharma 5.2 million pounds after they increased prices by as much as 2,600% in September 2012, the regulator said Wednesday. The price increases occurred after Pfizer transferred distribution rights to Flynn, which sold the medicine by its generic name, phenytoin sodium.

“The companies deliberately exploited the opportunity offered by de-branding to hike up the price for a drug which is relied upon by many thousands of patients,” said Philip Marsden, chairman of the Case Decision Group for the CMA’s investigation. “These extraordinary price rises have cost the NHS and the taxpayer tens of millions of pounds.’’

Britain’s National Health Service spent about 50 million pounds on the anti-epilepsy capsules in 2013 and 40 million pounds in 2014, the CMA said in its August 2015 complaint. The amount the NHS was charged for 100-milligram packs of the drug "rocketed" from 2.83 pounds to 67.50 pounds, before dropping to 54 pounds starting in May 2014, the CMA said Wednesday.

Loss-Making Product

Pfizer said that it “refutes” the findings of the regulator. Both companies said they will appeal.

“Phenytoin capsules were a loss-making product for Pfizer and the Flynn transaction represented an opportunity to secure ongoing supply of an important medicine for patients with epilepsy, while maintaining continuity of manufacture,” the company said in a statement. “When Flynn launched its product, the company set a price that was between 25 and 40 percent less than the price of the equivalent medicine from another supplier to the NHS which had long been regulated, and appeared to be acceptable to, the Department of Health.”

A Flynn spokesman said the CMA had "ignored or misunderstood" important aspects of its investigation, including the fact that alternative epilepsy drugs were more expensive than phenytoin.

"Phenytoin sodium capsules are already less expensive than the alternative equivalent drugs in the U.K. market," a Flynn spokesman said. "It beggars belief that the CMA seeks to punish Flynn for selling phenytoin capsules at a significant discount to phenytoin tablets."

Prior to September 2012, prices were regulated when Pfizer manufactured and sold phenytoin sodium capsules to U.K. wholesalers and pharmacies under the brand name Epanutin, the CMA said. In September 2012, Pfizer sold the distribution rights for Epanutin to Flynn Pharma, which de-branded the drug, meaning that it was no longer subject to price regulation.

"Although Pfizer has claimed that Epanutin was loss-making before it was de-branded, the CMA has calculated that, according to Pfizer’s figures, all such losses would have been recovered within two months of the price rises," the regulator said.

Phenytoin sodium, sold as Dilantin in the U.S., is used to prevent and control seizures by reducing the spread of seizure activity in the brain.

Crack Down on Behavior

"This is the highest fine the CMA has imposed and it sends out a clear message to the sector that we are determined to crack down on such behavior and to protect customers, including the NHS, and taxpayers from being exploited," the CMA’s Marsden said.

By Patrick Gower

Popular Sponsored Recommendations

Empowering the Modern Workforce: The Power of Connected Worker Technologies

March 1, 2024
Explore real-world strategies to boost worker safety, collaboration, training, and productivity in manufacturing. Emphasizing Industry 4.0, we'll discuss digitalization and automation...

3 Best Practices to Create a Product-Centric Competitive Advantage with PRO.FILE PLM

Jan. 25, 2024
Gain insight on best practices and strategies you need to accelerate engineering change management and reduce time to market. Register now for your opportunity to accelerate your...

Transformative Capabilities for XaaS Models in Manufacturing

Feb. 14, 2024
The manufacturing sector is undergoing a pivotal shift toward "servitization," or enhancing product offerings with services and embracing a subscription model. This transition...

Shifting Your Business from Products to Service-Based Business Models: Generating Predictable Revenues

Oct. 27, 2023
Executive summary on a recent IndustryWeek-hosted webinar sponsored by SAP

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!