Adam Glanzman/Getty Images
Industryweek 24194 New Balance
Industryweek 24194 New Balance
Industryweek 24194 New Balance
Industryweek 24194 New Balance
Industryweek 24194 New Balance

Chinese Court Awards $1.5 Million in Copyright Damages to New Balance

Aug. 24, 2017
The judgement is a very rare victory for a Western brand in an intellectual property infringement case in China, and the damages are far larger than usually granted by Chinese courts.

A Chinese court has awarded U.S. athletics shoemaker New Balance some $1.5 million in copyright damages over its famous "N" logo, a rare victory for a Western brand in the country.

A court in the eastern city of Suzhou ruled that three defendants who made shoes under the brand name New Boom "acted in concert to infringe" the rights of the U.S. firm, according to a copy of the verdict obtained Thursday by AFP.

The judges noted the almost perfect similarity of the logos, along with other factors, and concluded that the counterfeit products could be "easily confused" with the authentic U.S. shoes.

The court ordered the three -- entrepreneur Zheng Chaosong and the Xinpingheng and Bosidake companies -- jointly to pay about 10 million yuan in damages.

New Balance has had a presence since 1995 in China, where sales of sports equipment are growing rapidly. 

The judgement is a very rare victory for a Western brand in an intellectual property infringement case in China, and the damages are far larger than usually granted by Chinese courts. 

The decision was announced shortly after President Donald Trump launched a sweeping investigation into China's record on intellectual property. 

Many foreign companies say China's judicial system is lax on counterfeiters.

New Balance in April 2015 lost a lawsuit against a Chinese investor who had registered the Mandarin name of the American shoemaker ("Xinbailun") on his own behalf.

Similarly, a Chinese leather craftsman who in 2007 registered an "IPHONE" trademark for a category of leather goods won a lawsuit last year against electronics giant Apple. 

The judges ruled he registered it before iPhones arrived in China.

In another notable ruling a Beijing court in 2015 rejected a complaint by basketball player Michael Jordan against a Chinese sportswear brand for using his name in Mandarin. 

But a subsequent court ruling in Jordan's favor finally last year allowed the former NBA star to reclaim his name. 

Copyright 2017 Agence France-Presse

Popular Sponsored Recommendations

Empowering the Modern Workforce: The Power of Connected Worker Technologies

March 1, 2024
Explore real-world strategies to boost worker safety, collaboration, training, and productivity in manufacturing. Emphasizing Industry 4.0, we'll discuss digitalization and automation...

Adopting an Open Ecosystem: The Way Forward for Frontline Operations

March 11, 2024
Today's manufacturing tech stack thrives on connectivity, integrating new and legacy players for a seamless operation - not on monolithic systems. Embrace the future of frontline...

3 Best Practices to Create a Product-Centric Competitive Advantage with PRO.FILE PLM

Jan. 25, 2024
Gain insight on best practices and strategies you need to accelerate engineering change management and reduce time to market. Register now for your opportunity to accelerate your...

Transformative Capabilities for XaaS Models in Manufacturing

Feb. 14, 2024
The manufacturing sector is undergoing a pivotal shift toward "servitization," or enhancing product offerings with services and embracing a subscription model. This transition...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!