U.S. CEOs, Academics Seeks To Roll Back Post-Enron Regulations

Dec. 1, 2006
Concern over regulations impeding IPOs.

A coalition of U.S. business leaders and academics said Nov. 30 that U.S. business regulation has gone too far in the post-Enron era and urged reforms including an easing of the Sarbanes-Oxley law. The report, adding further weight to the reform movement, said the competitiveness of America's capital markets was being threatened by "excessive regulation and litigation."

The Committee on Capital Markets Regulation, an independent panel started by a Harvard University academic, called for urgent changes to shore up U.S. capital markets amid stiff overseas competition from London and Hong Kong for initial public offerings (IPOs). Citing a heavy fall in U.S .IPO activity, coupled with a rise in the number of American companies choosing to go private, the panel issued a report saying accounting standards had become too rigid in the wake of a flurry of business scandals including Enron.

The panel's report was issued a week after Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson called for a "more agile" regulatory framework for publicly traded U.S. companies. Paulson has signaled he is concerned about the decline in the number of companies seeking a public listing, or IPO, on U.S. exchanges.

The panel's report also said that criminal indictments of companies should be a "last resort," and that outside executive directors should not be held "responsible for corporate malfeasance that they cannot possibly detect."

Among other recommendations, the panel also said companies should ask shareholders to waive the right to a jury trial and seek recourse before a judge instead, as well as urging better coordination between federal and state securities regulators. Judges tend to approve lower damage awards against companies that engage in wrongdoing compared to citizen juries. The panel also backed a so-called principles-based rules system which is perceived as being less rigid for auditors. U.S. accountants currently operate under a rules-based system which is seen as being more onerous than the principles-based system favored in Europe.

Copyright Agence France-Presse, 2006

Popular Sponsored Recommendations

Empowering the Modern Workforce: The Power of Connected Worker Technologies

March 1, 2024
Explore real-world strategies to boost worker safety, collaboration, training, and productivity in manufacturing. Emphasizing Industry 4.0, we'll discuss digitalization and automation...

How Organizations Connect and Engage with Frontline Workers

June 14, 2023
Nearly 80% of the 2.7 billion workers across manufacturing, construction, healthcare, transportation, agriculture, hospitality, and education are frontline. Learn best practices...

Transformative Capabilities for XaaS Models in Manufacturing

Feb. 14, 2024
The manufacturing sector is undergoing a pivotal shift toward "servitization," or enhancing product offerings with services and embracing a subscription model. This transition...

Shifting Your Business from Products to Service-Based Business Models: Generating Predictable Revenues

Oct. 27, 2023
Executive summary on a recent IndustryWeek-hosted webinar sponsored by SAP

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!