Industryweek 3578 Bratzgold595
Industryweek 3578 Bratzgold595
Industryweek 3578 Bratzgold595
Industryweek 3578 Bratzgold595
Industryweek 3578 Bratzgold595

U.S. Court Throws Out Bratz Doll Award Against Mattel

Jan. 24, 2013
Appellate judges say claim was improperly litigated, tell combatants to 'play nice.'

LOS ANGELES -- A U.S. appeals Thursday court threw out a multimillion dollar award against toy manufacturer Mattel (IW 500/163) in a long-running dispute with a rival over Bratz children's dolls.

Mattel was ordered to pay its competitor MGA Entertainment $170 million in 2011, along with nearly $140 million in legal fees, in the dispute over ownership claims for the lucrative doll line aimed at pre-teen girls.

But the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the claim was improperly litigated, so it quashed the verdict -- and urged both sides to "play nice."

MGA launched Bratz dolls in June 2001 and they quickly became the top competitor to Mattel's world-famous Barbie, racking up more than $1 billion in annual sales and cutting into Mattel's market dominance with Barbie.

In a first trial in 2008, a jury sided with Mattel and awarded $100 million in damages. MGA was ordered to turn over the franchise to Mattel and stop making and selling Bratz products -- but the order was overturned on appeal and sent back for a retrial.

Mattel argued that Carter Bryant, Bratz's creator and a former Barbie designer, invented the dolls in 1999 during his second stint with the company and that he violated the terms of his employment by taking his ideas to MGA.

MGA, meanwhile, accused Mattel of spying on its rivals, including using false identification cards to enter the MGA premises to photograph its products without authorization.

A jury also last year rejected copyright infringement claims by Mattel against MGA Entertainment, and awarded MGA $88.4 million in damages.

Thursday's ruling appears unlikely to be the end of the legal war -- even as the federal appellate panel cautioned the rival toymakers against throwing any new judicial tantrums.

"While this may not be the last word on the subject, perhaps Mattel and MGA can take a lesson from their target demographic: Play nice," it said.

Following the appeals court's decision, Mattel issued a statement, which read in part: "While MGA can in theory bring a new lawsuit based on its toy fair claims, we are confident that such a lawsuit will be barred by the statute of limitations. We look forward to the speedy and final resolution of this dispute, and will continue to focus our efforts on successfully competing in the marketplace."

Copyright Agence France-Presse, 2013; IW contributed to this report

Popular Sponsored Recommendations

How Can Manufacturers Adapt Field Service Today?

June 13, 2023
If you are looking for new sources of revenue and profit, your field service operation is a promising place to look. Learn how a new generation of field service tools and technologies...

Smart Factory Impact on Manufacturing KPIs

Feb. 1, 2024
Explore the transformative power of Smart Factory solutions beyond OEE metrics. This whitepaper outlines the untapped potential, revealing how a holistic approach can elevate ...

Food and Beverage 2024 Trends and Outlook for North America

Oct. 29, 2023
Ready to hear what 200 of your peers said are the top challenges and opportunities in 2024? Don’t fall behind. Uncover actionable insights to better prepare for 2024 in this whitepaper...

Transformative Capabilities for XaaS Models in Manufacturing

Feb. 14, 2024
The manufacturing sector is undergoing a pivotal shift toward "servitization," or enhancing product offerings with services and embracing a subscription model. This transition...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!