Bush's Budget Assumes Only 0.7% Real GDP Growth In 2002

Jan. 13, 2005
By John S. McClenahen By most standards, $9.382 trillion is a lot of money. But that estimate for U.S. inflation-adjusted GDP this calendar year, contained in the fiscal year 2003 federal budget that the Bush Administration submitted this week, is only ...
ByJohn S. McClenahen By most standards, $9.382 trillion is a lot of money. But that estimate for U.S. inflation-adjusted GDP this calendar year, contained in the fiscal year 2003 federal budget that the Bush Administration submitted this week, is only 0.7% higher than the $9.313 trillion GDP the White House figures the U.S. reached in calendar year 2001. And compared with the 1.9% growth in real GDP that Merrill Lynch & Co., New York is now expecting in calendar 2002, the Administration is decidedly bearish. As for inflation itself, the White House foresees a 1.9% increase in the U.S. Labor Department's Consumer Price Index this year; Merrill Lynch expects a smaller 1.1% rise. Their positions are reversed on unemployment. Merrill Lynch expects joblessness to average 6.4% this year; the Bush Administration anticipates a smaller 5.9%. The bottom line on the budget: an $80 billion deficit, with $2.048 trillion in tax and other receipts not quite keeping pace with the $2.128 trillion in spending the White House proposes for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1, 2002.

Sponsored Recommendations

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!

IndustryWeek Photo Essay with Image Courtesy of Allison Transmission
Allison Transmission's plant in Indianapolis is a top-performing facility and was the site of factory tours for IndustryWeek's 2024 Operations Leadership Summit. The company improved to No. 1 on the IndustryWeek 50 Best U.S. Manufacturers List for 2025, up from No. 2 in 2024.
© Albertshakirov | Dreamstime.com
daddreamstime_xxl_139613399
IndustryWeek
iw_500_logo

Sponsored