Options Expensing: Postponed Today, 'Tsunami' Tomorrow?

Compiled By Deborah Austin Following recent accounting scandals, corporations face investor pressure to classify employee stock options as an expense. But 53% of major corporations say they're postponing such decisions; only 8% plan to begin expensing ...
Jan. 13, 2005
Compiled ByDeborah Austin Following recent accounting scandals, corporations face investor pressure to classify employee stock options as an expense. But 53% of major corporations say they're postponing such decisions; only 8% plan to begin expensing options within the next year -- and another 35% only if mandated by legislative/regulatory changes -- suggests a recent survey by professional services firm Deloitte & Touche LLP. The toughest issue: finding proper valuation methodologies. Of respondents, 91% currently do not expense options. Under U.S. accounting rules, companies can choose to expense options or disclose them in financial reports' footnotes. However, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) -- which sets U.S. rules -- is considering converging standards with the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), which proposes mandatory share-based payment expensing. Such proposals -- coupled with prominent companies' expensing plan announcements -- could trigger an "options-expensing Tsunami" further squelching stock prices, warns Deloitte & Touche. Of survey respondents, 72% say stock options are their only long-term incentive program; 61% are considering returning to cash-based performance plans.
Sign up for IndustryWeek Newsletters
Get the latest news and updates.

Voice Your Opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!