Proposed Family Leave Expansion Draws Business Fire

Jan. 13, 2005
Business groups are reacting sharply in opposition to President Clinton's announcement Nov. 30 of new family-leave regulations by the Dept. of Labor that would allow states to make unemployment-insurance (UI) payments to parents of newborn or newly ...

Business groups are reacting sharply in opposition to President Clinton's announcement Nov. 30 of new family-leave regulations by the Dept. of Labor that would allow states to make unemployment-insurance (UI) payments to parents of newborn or newly adopted children. "These regulations undermine the purpose and the solvency of the current unemployment system. If implemented by the states, they will add substantial costs to the UI system for a broader class of workers than contemplated by the current system," says Edward F. Potter, president of the Employment Policy Foundation, an employer group based in Washington, D.C. He points out that just last year -- even before the new regulations -- the Labor Dept. predicted that a recession similar to the one in the early 1980s would force 25 to 30 states to borrow between $20 billion and $25 billion to keep their UI systems solvent. "With the release of the regulations, the nation's UI system -- the safety net for workers who lose their jobs -- faces imminent danger," echoes Eric Oxfeld, President of UWC--Strategic Services on Unemployment and Workers' Compensation, Washington, D.C., also a business coalition. The group has launched a campaign to stop the proposal. Joining the campaign is another Washington, D.C., alliance, the Family & Medical Leave Act (FMLA) Technical Corrections Coalition. "We're not going to let them [the Administration] get away with this," pledges its executive director, Deanna Gelak. "When Congress debated the FMLA, it made a conscious decision not to require paid leave. If the Administration believes that the fundamental nature of the UI system should be changed to include an entirely different program, it should ask Congress and the American people, not try to sneak through the regulatory back door by unilaterally modifying the scope of the federal unemployment law when Congress is out of town."

Popular Sponsored Recommendations

Four Common OT Cybersecurity Pitfalls for Manufacturers

April 4, 2023
For the last six years, Dragos has leveraged their Professional Services team to develop an on-the-ground understanding of the realities facing the industrial community and to...

Empowering the Modern Workforce: The Power of Connected Worker Technologies

March 1, 2024
Explore real-world strategies to boost worker safety, collaboration, training, and productivity in manufacturing. Emphasizing Industry 4.0, we'll discuss digitalization and automation...

How Manufacturers Can Optimize Operations with Weather Intelligence

Nov. 2, 2023
The bad news? Severe weather has emerged as one of the biggest threats to continuity and safety in manufacturing. The good news? The intelligence solutions that build weather ...

Transformative Capabilities for XaaS Models in Manufacturing

Feb. 14, 2024
The manufacturing sector is undergoing a pivotal shift toward "servitization," or enhancing product offerings with services and embracing a subscription model. This transition...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!