Survey: Documentation Tops Sarbanes-Oxley Costs

Jan. 13, 2005
By John S. McClenahen Senior executives of U.S.-based multinational companies put documentation at the top of their costs of complying with the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, a law designed to improve the accuracy of corporate financial statements, according ...
ByJohn S. McClenahen Senior executives of U.S.-based multinational companies put documentation at the top of their costs of complying with the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, a law designed to improve the accuracy of corporate financial statements, according to a survey done for PricewaterhouseCoopers, a professional services firm. Other costs cited by the executives: legal requirements, detailed policy development, self-assessment, attest and certification requirements, and staff training. Only 41% mentioned the cost of new tools and technology. Overall, 56% of the 150 executives interviewed said that initial compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley was not very costly for their companies, while 44% characterized it as "somewhat costly" or "very costly." Those executives able to estimate total cost of Sarbanes-Oxley compliance expected it to average 10.4% of their management controls budget during the next two years. However, 42% of the executives said they could not estimate the cost of compliance.

Popular Sponsored Recommendations

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!