On Management: John Mariotti

Dec. 21, 2004
What gets measured gets done

The headline on this column may be an overworked clich, but only because it is all too true. More significantly, it suggests that developing proper measurement systems poses a challenge for businesses. A friend of mine, Will Kaydos, would agree. He has written two books on the subject, including Operational Performance Measurement: Increasing Total Productivity (1999, St. Lucie Press). In a recent conversation, I asked Will to help me identify a few of the most common measurement problems -- along with solutions to share with readers of this column. Here's what we came up with:

  • Measuring what's easy to measure, instead of what's important to measure. Companies must measure what's important to their customers, to the processes they employ to provide goods or services, and to the company itself. However, many companies focus too much on short-term financial measures and too little on metrics related to quality, customer service, and new-product development. They measure direct labor productivity to four significant digits, when that is the least likely thing to give them a competitive advantage.
  • Failure to get beyond scorekeeping. Knowing the score is one thing; improving it is quite another. For example, knowing that on-time deliveries were only 65% last month doesn't tell you what caused the late deliveries. They could have been caused by any number of problems. Without going beyond the "score" to more revealing levels of detail, the causes of deviations in performance cannot be determined -- and if the causes are unknown, effective solutions simply cannot be developed.
  • Failure to establish accountability for all aspects of a product and its production processes. Consider the following two scenarios, in which a CEO is meeting with his vice presidents. In scenario A, the CEO declares, "Our on-time delivery is awful and we must improve it -- fast. Now let's get out there and make it happen." In scenario B, however, the CEO asserts, "We must increase our on-time deliveries from 65% to 95% or better. During the last month, the following reasons contributed to late deliveries: engineering changes -- 35%, late receipt of customer specs -- 29%, production equipment downtime -- 20%, internal manufacturing quality problems -- 12%, and other reasons -- 4%. "You all have copies of a report providing additional detail about the nature of the problems. What I need from each of you is a plan of action showing how your department can help to substantially reduce the problems affecting on-time deliveries." In scenario A, everyone except the manufacturing VP will probably blame the late deliveries on manufacturing. In scenario B, accountability for each component of the general symptom is quite clear. If no one is accountable for performance, little will be done to improve it. And without good, insightful measurements, there can be no meaningful accountability. Nothing is more unfair, demotivating, or fruitless than blaming someone for performance problems created by others.
  • Not choosing relevant measures -- and not providing feedback. Managers want relevant, fair performance measures as well as feedback about their own performance. Unfortunately, very few middle and front-line managers get this. There is an inherent desire to perform well, but managers and employees often don't know what "good performance" means, either because measures are lacking or actionable feedback about their performance is absent.
It is difficult to achieve results if you don't know what the goals are and how you are doing. Many managers and executives are far more willing to set goals than to discuss how to measure success. Good measures inevitably lead to better performance. Often, simply having a group of employees measure something they are doing will result in improvement. It is just human nature to want to do better -- and good measures make tracking that improvement possible. John Mariotti, a former manufacturing CEO, is president of The Enterprise Group, a consulting business. He lives in Knoxville. His e-mail address is [email protected].

Popular Sponsored Recommendations

Global Supply Chain Readiness Report: The Pandemic and Beyond

Sept. 23, 2022
Jabil and IndustryWeek look into how manufacturers are responding to supply chain woes.

Empowering the Modern Workforce: The Power of Connected Worker Technologies

March 1, 2024
Explore real-world strategies to boost worker safety, collaboration, training, and productivity in manufacturing. Emphasizing Industry 4.0, we'll discuss digitalization and automation...

How Manufacturers Can Optimize Operations with Weather Intelligence

Nov. 2, 2023
The bad news? Severe weather has emerged as one of the biggest threats to continuity and safety in manufacturing. The good news? The intelligence solutions that build weather ...

How Organizations Connect and Engage with Frontline Workers

June 14, 2023
Nearly 80% of the 2.7 billion workers across manufacturing, construction, healthcare, transportation, agriculture, hospitality, and education are frontline. Learn best practices...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!