Industryweek 2179 10315correll

Alternative Media Hits Target

May 23, 2005
Georgia-Pacific CEO A.D. "Pete" Correll taps into big names, popular places to connect to customers.

Having products in nearly nine of 10 homes indicates that Georgia-Pacific Corp. knows a thing or two about advertising. A.D. "Pete" Correll, Georgia-Pacific's CEO, explains his firm's advertising decisions and what it means to be associated with racing and Mickey Mouse.

IW: In terms of advertising, Georgia-Pacific has moved toward alternative media. Can you explain the processes and decisions behind sponsoring a car in NASCAR and the alliance with Walt Disney Parks and Resorts?

Correll: NASCAR is a unique opportunity. Its fan base is exactly the demographics of our consumer -- middle America. It's the same family that shops at Wal-Mart, Home Depot, Lowes, Sam's Club, Costco, which is where our goods are sold. The fans are incredibly loyal to sponsors of the sport. And then we had this unique opportunity to associate ourselves with the Petty family. Richard Petty and the Petty name are one of the most recognized and respected names in the United States. It almost was a no-brainer. Now what we need, of course, is better on-track performance. As the car performs better, we get a much better return on our investment. Factually it has been a very good investment for our company.

Why Disney? You've got the same thing. You've got one of the phenomenal worldwide brands. We're a company where our brands are in 85% of the consumers' homes, but we don't have a killer brand. We don't have a Charmin or a Bounty. So the association with a firm like Disney or NASCAR, the opportunity to sponsor an attraction as well as be in all the theme parks with our goods with high visibility is a more effective way to spend our advertising and promotion dollars. It's just more effective than mass TV advertising.

IW: What are your thoughts on traditional mass marketing?

Georgia-Pacific CEO A.D. "Pete" CorrellCorrell: Like most companies, I think we learn as much from our mistakes as we do our successes. We've run a lot of TV advertising that got very high ratings, some of which won awards. But when we looked at the absolute pull-through to the goods, it was a questionable investment. When we get something like this integrated campaign we ran on Brawny, where you pick up a tremendous amount of free media on "Can You Name A Brawny Man?" and the "Brawny Man Makeover" -- when you get Jay Leno and people like that making fun of your advertising and talking about it on their shows for nothing, then you really can afford to run some TV advertising to reinforce it. But stand-alone TV advertising is very hard at the rates that the networks charge. [Add to that] low audience participation and this horrible thing developed call TiVo, where you can zap out the commercials, and non-traditional mediums are just more attractive than traditional, stand-alone TV advertising.

IW: You quoted Bill Johnson, CEO of H.J. Heinz and member of the Georgia-Pacific board, as saying, "50% of your advertising is effective. The problem is, you just don't know which 50% it is." Where do you think NASCAR and Disney are right now?

Correll: Well I think it is the 50% that is effective, but am I absolutely sure? The answer is of course not. Advertising is very hard to know what is effective. You can get panels to view the ads. You can get focus groups. You can get responses, but the real question is do people go pick your product off the shelf because of the ads. And I have a higher confidence that the answer to that question is yes in non-traditional mediums.

Sponsored Recommendations

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!