Revenues Revved Up to Record High

Heavy industrial sectors, including machinery and motor vehicles, fuel a spike in U.S. manufacturing revenue and profit growth in 2011.
The IW U.S. 500 Largest Manufacturing Companies in the United States

Technology Sector

In the technology sector, Apple Inc. (IW 500/9) was the shining star, jumping five spots on the annual ranking. The company realized revenue growth of 66% and a profit increase of 85% to $25.9 billion, bolstered by the success of its iPad and iPhone.

Industries that continue to struggle include manufacturers that supply the housing and construction sectors. Average profits dropped 32.6% for the wood-products sector. The industry also showed the slowest rate of revenue growth at 0.11%. Furniture and fixtures and stone, clay, glass and concrete products sectors also struggled in 2011.

Some notable companies that are not present on this year's IW 500 include Timberland Co., which VF Corp. (IW 500/110) acquired last June; Baldor Electric Co., which ABB Ltd. purchased on Jan. 27; and National Semiconductor Corp., which merged with Texas Instruments Inc. (IW 500/88).

For 2012, manufacturing growth is expected to begin slowing down with volume increases nearly even with 2011 at 5%, says IHS's Runiewicz. By 2013, growth will slow to approximately 3% as manufacturers' capital-investment needs are filled, he says. Also contributing to the slowdown is a projected drop in capital-equipment exports. "You're going to see some real struggling in terms of exports for capital equipment," Runiewicz says.

A drop in the euro against the dollar combined with increasing competition from European manufacturers could impact exports, Runiewicz says.

Click here for the IndustryWeek U.S. 500

Please or Register to post comments.

Past Years' Lists
  • The IndustryWeek 1000

  • The IndustryWeek
    U.S. 500

  • IW's 50 Best
    U.S. Manufacturers

Subscribe to IW Newsletters

This would be valid if only colleagues could interact. I have seen many workplaces in large organizations where only management can interact. All infomation must flow through managers. To make it worse the work layout does not support interactions. ... If you want the benefits of co-location you have to have the right management structure and the right physical structure!!!

on Feb. 26, 2013
IW Marketplace - Buy a Link Now