How GM Committed Suicide By Degrees And How To Avoid The Same Fate

July 28, 2009
Wanted to call attention to an interesting two-post series on the WSJ's Management 2.0 blog. Author Gary Hamel breaks down why he thinks GM ended up where it is today -- just this side of solvency, amputating brands and cutting costs to the bone in the ...

Wanted to call attention to an interesting two-post series on the WSJ's Management 2.0 blog. Author Gary Hamel breaks down why he thinks GM ended up where it is today -- just this side of solvency, amputating brands and cutting costs to the bone in the hopes of stopping the rot and getting some healthy growth to return.

Both part one and part two are worth a read; I'll just call out a quick couple of points that made sense to me:

In business as in biology, big things grow slower.
In the long-run there are no growth companies.
For many companies, well-informed customers are now a bigger threat to margins than well-armed competitors.
...most businesses were never built to changethey were built to do one thing exceedingly well and highly efficientlyforever.
Years of continuous improvement produce an ultra-efficient business systemone that's highly optimized, and also highly inflexible.
Long-tenured executives develop a deep base of industry experience and find it hard to question cherished beliefs.


Each of these points is plucked out of context here, but over the course of the article, you get a sense of how a lack of vision and complacency caused GM to lose its mojo, one quarter at a time. Here's a representative paragraph:

Ever since I can remember, GM's defenders have been arguing that the company was making progress; and they were right. GM has been getting better for a very long timebut it's been 40 years since it was the best. The Chevrolet Malibu and Corvette ZR1, the Buick Enclave and Cadillac CTS-V: these are exceptional cars by anyone's standards. Problem is, they are even more exceptional when judged against the persistent ordinariness of GM's other products. For years, excellence at GM has been an occasional aberration, rather than an all-consuming passion.

As much as I agree with Hamel on the macro trends and his characterization of GM's last half-century of business as a type of reverse punctuated equilibrium, I'm going to have to respectfully disagree on the Enclave. Not a fan.

(Here's a shot of the Corvette ZR-1 instead.)
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/corvette_zr1_37_450.jpg

Popular Sponsored Recommendations

3D Printing a More Efficient Factory Floor

Nov. 16, 2023
Today’s additive manufacturing platforms make it simple to print a wide range of high-performing industrial parts as soon as possible and right where you need them — unlocking...

Food and Beverage 2024 Trends and Outlook for North America

Oct. 29, 2023
Ready to hear what 200 of your peers said are the top challenges and opportunities in 2024? Don’t fall behind. Uncover actionable insights to better prepare for 2024 in this whitepaper...

Process Mining For Dummies

Nov. 19, 2023
Here it is. Everything you need to know about process mining in a single book, written in the easy-to-understand, hard-to-forget style that ‘For Dummies’ manages so effortlessly...

Turning Your Frontline Workforce into a Competitive Advantage: A Comprehensive Guide

Sept. 19, 2023
In this guide, we'll explore how manufacturers are using digital technologies to preserve the bottom line and maintain growth by enabling and empowering their #1 asset - their...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!