WTO Says Washington Should Fall In Line With Steel Ruling

Aug. 17, 2005
The World Trade Organization (WTO) on August 17 called on the U.S. to fall into line with an earlier ruling that criticized the way Washington applied penalties against privatized European steel companies.  A WTO compliance panel found that the U.S. had ...

The World Trade Organization (WTO) on August 17 called on the U.S. to fall into line with an earlier ruling that criticized the way Washington applied penalties against privatized European steel companies. A WTO compliance panel found that the U.S. had failed in part to act on the global trade referee's December 2002 ruling, which said Washington imposed so-called countervailing measures without proving adequately that American firms were suffering from unfair European competition.

Under an accord among the 148 governments in the WTO, members can use tariffs to punish trade partners if they believe they are breaching the rules of global commerce -- but must stay within the rules when they use such penalties. Washington respected the 2002 ruling with regard to French firm Usinor, but failed to play fair with British Steel, now the Anglo-Dutch group Corus, and Spain's Aceralia, the WTO said in its report.

The spat, one of several involving steel at the WTO, has been running for almost five years. In November 2000, the European Union filed a complaint against the U.S., which had decided to hit a handful of previously state-owned European steel firms with tariffs. Washington maintained that the companies had an unfair advantage because they had received state aid before being privatized between 1987 and 1998. The dispute centered on whether "arm's length, fair-market value" privatization always prevented the benefit from state aid from accruing to the new private firm.

In its 2002 ruling, the WTO said that legislation in the U.S. did comply with the Geneva-based trade body's accord on subsidies and countervailing measures. But the WTO said Washington had acted inconsistently with trade rules by imposing and maintaining countervailing measures on steel products from privatized European steel companies without determining whether subsidies actually continued to exist.

Copyright Agence France-Presse, 2005

Popular Sponsored Recommendations

Modern Edge Computing Accelerates Smart Manufacturing Initiatives for Discrete Manufacturers

Oct. 22, 2023
Discover how Edge Computing platforms are a requisite for discrete manufacturers to solve production challenges, accelerate digitalization, and establish a reliable infrastructure...

Lean Manufacturing in the Age of the Industrial Internet

Oct. 24, 2023
Read how advanced MES capabilities can help you improve your labor utilization, reduce WIP, and optimize your production. Download the white paper today.

The Ultimate Ecommerce Excellence Checklist

Oct. 2, 2023
Scaling ecommerce operations is no easy task when your business is moving fast. Assess your current ecommerce maturity level and set optimization priorities with this practical...

Gain a competitive edge with real-world lessons on private 5G networks

Nov. 16, 2023
The use of private networks in manufacturing applications is rapidly growing. In this paper, we present valuable insights and lessons learned from the field with the goal of enhancing...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!