Manufacturing 1/22/2026 The choice between the two depends on the nature of the business, the type of inventory, and the company’s management objectives. Inventory costing plays a critical role in financial reporting because it directly affects asset valuation, profitability, and operational decision making. Two commonly used costing methods are average costing and standard costing, each offering different advantages depending on the nature of the business and its inventory. Understanding the differences helps organizations determine which method aligns with their goals. Average costing of inventory Average costing, often referred to as the weighted average cost method, calculates the average unit cost of all inventory available for sale during a period. This method is appropriate when inventory items are homogeneous or when purchase prices fluctuate frequently. How it’s calculated Average cost per unit = total cost of goods available for sale ÷ total units available Example 200 units at $12 each Total cost - (100 x $10) + (200 x $12) = $3,400 Total units - 300 Advantages and disadvantages of using average costing of inventory Advantages It’s simple to calculate and apply, smooths out price fluctuations over time, and is suitable for homogeneous inventory items. Disadvantages This method may not reflect the actual cost of specific purchases, especially in volatile pricing environments. Standard costing of inventory Standard costing assigns a predetermined cost or "standard" cost to inventory items rather than using actual costs. This method is commonly used in manufacturing environments where budgeting and performance measurement are essential. How it’s calculated Total inventory value = units on hand × standard cost per unit Example If the standard cost per unit is set at $11, then 300 units are valued at $3,300, regardless of actual purchase or production costs. Components of inventory Product costs generally consist of direct materials, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead. The standard costs are often based on the combination of the estimated future costs or trends, historical data, and/or industry benchmarks. Historical information serves as a good starting point. However, using historical information might lead to incorporating past inefficiencies into the new standard. Direct material standards Direct material standards are calculated by multiplying the standard quantity by the standard price. Differences between standard and actual results create material variances. Favorable variance is when actual usage is lower than the standard quantity, or the actual purchase price is lower than the standard price. Unfavorable variance is when actual results exceed the established standards. At the end of the accounting period, all variances are closed to cost of goods sold, directly affecting the period’s bottom line. Variances are often unavoidable. Some are controllable (e.g., supplier discounts on bulk orders), while others are uncontrollable (e.g., unexpected freight increases due to events like a pandemic). Having a variance, including an unfavorable one, is not necessarily a bad thing. Managers must understand the underlying cause of the variance to evaluate its results. Direct labor Standard labor cost is based on the estimated labor hours required to produce one unit and the labor rate per hour. Labor hour standards can be developed by observing workers perform each task and averaging those results. Standard labor rates typically include the employee's base pay plus fringe benefits and should reflect expected increases in compensation. An example favorable labor variance is when a company uses higher quality raw materials, it may allow for easier handling of material, which may lead to higher production volumes. In contrast, if employees have low morale and limited motivation to improve their skills, this may result in an unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance. Overhead Overhead standards are typically calculated by dividing a single overhead cost pool by one driver, such as machine hours or direct labor hours. Some companies use activity-based costing (ABC), which allocates overhead across multiple cost pools with more specific drivers. One advantage of ABC is improved pricing accuracy, particularly in target costing environments. Favorable overhead variance might result from the installation of more efficient manufacturing equipment, resulting in fewer productions hours needed. In contrast, old machines might have more break-down time that slowed down production, resulting in unfavorable overhead variance. Changes to standard cost Companies commonly update standard costs annually. However, during economic uncertainty, more frequent updates may be necessary. Standards should also be revised when product designs or production processes change. Regular review of material prices and labor rates helps standards remain relevant. Advantages and disadvantages of using standard costing of inventory Advantages It helps with budgeting, provides variance analysis, and supports performance measurement. By analyzing variances, management can identify areas where costs can be controlled and where efficiency can be improved. It also helps management understand current costs and prepare for managing future costs. Variance analysis supports performance evaluation for both personnel and systems. Training based on standard costs allows organizations to control costs and reduce waste by eliminating unnecessary steps in the production process while striving to meet established standards. These practices also empower employees to learn from the standards and refine their processes. Management doesn’t need to analyze every variance; only those falling outside an acceptable range require further review. Disadvantages It may not reflect current market conditions if costs fluctuate significantly and the standards have not been updated. This limitation can be reduced by performing regular updates to standard costs and verifying variances are closely monitored and properly explained. Is standard costing acceptable under U.S. GAAP? The use of standard costs is acceptable under U.S. GAAP provided the standards reasonably approximate actual costs under one of the permitted costing methods (e.g., FIFO, average cost, or LIFO). To achieve this, companies update standard costs at reasonable intervals to reflect current conditions and verify variances between actual and standard costs are absorbed into inventory at the reporting date. When standards are updated only once a year, companies often record a one time potentially material adjustment to inventory and net earnings, to reflect the accumulated variances. When standards are reviewed and adjusted more frequently, the difference between standard and actual costs is likely narrowed, resulting in smaller adjustment to inventory and net earnings for the reporting period. Key differences between average and standard costing Aspect U.S. GAAP Acceptable method Acceptable method if variances between standard and actual costs are allocated to inventory at period end Impact on financial statements Reflects actual cost trends May overstate or understate inventory if variances between standard and actual costs are not allocated Complexity Use case Examples How CLA can help assess average and standard costing options Both average and standard costing methods play important roles in inventory valuation and management . Average costing is straightforward and well suited for businesses with uniform inventory and frequent price changes. Standard costing is beneficial for budgeting, variance analysis, and performance measurement, especially in manufacturing environments . Many companies use standard costing to improve operational efficiency and cost control. The choice between the two depends on the nature of the business, the type of inventory, and the company’s management objectives. Understanding these differences helps businesses select the most appropriate costing method for accurate accounting and strategic decision making. CLA can help your company weigh the pros and cons. This blog contains general information and does not constitute the rendering of legal, accounting, investment, tax, or other professional services. Consult with your advisors regarding the applicability of this content to your specific circumstances. © 2026 CliftonLarsonAllen. All rights reserved. "CliftonLarsonAllen" and "CLA" refer to CliftonLarsonAllen LLP. Securities and investment advisory services are offered through CliftonLarsonAllen Wealth Advisors, LLC, an SEC-registered investment advisor, member FINRA/SIPC. CliftonLarsonAllen is a Minnesota LLP, with about 120 locations across the United States. The Minnesota certificate number is 00963. The California license number is 7083. The Maryland permit number is 39235. The New York permit number is 64508. The North Carolina certificate number is 26858. If you have questions regarding individual license information, please contact Elizabeth Spencer . CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP), an independent legal entity, is a network member of CLA Global , an international organization of independent accounting and advisory firms. Each CLA Global network firm is a member of CLA Global Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee. CLA Global Limited does not practice accountancy or provide any services to clients. CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP) is not an agent of any other member of CLA Global Limited, cannot obligate any other member firm, and is liable only for its own acts or omissions and not those of any other member firm. Similarly, CLA Global Limited cannot act as an agent of any member firm and cannot obligate any member firm. The names “CLA Global” and/or “CliftonLarsonAllen,” and the associated logo, are used under license.