Logistics 5/21/2026 A recent Supreme Court decision is putting new attention on a familiar risk for logistics companies: carrier selection. A recent Supreme Court decision is putting new attention on a familiar risk for logistics companies: carrier selection. The Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II ruling reinforces when a broker or 3PL hires a carrier, it can be held responsible if that carrier causes a safety related incident and the broker or 3PL’s selection process of that carrier falls short of reasonable care. For logistics companies using third-party carriers, the ruling has real operational implications. The likely impact of the court decision on logistics companies The decision is expected to drive more consistency and scrutiny around a few key areas: Stronger carrier vetting expectations Carrier selection has always been important, but this ruling reinforces it as critical risk control. Companies may need to revisit how they: Evaluate safety histories and violations Review driver and carrier records Verify insurance coverage and documentation Greater emphasis on documentation Logistics companies won’t have to just perform due diligence, they’ll have to demonstrate it. Consistent documentation of how carriers are evaluated and approved may become more important in the event of a claim or lawsuit. Insurance and risk considerations With clearer exposure, companies may re-evaluate their insurance coverage and risk management strategies. There is already discussion in the market about how this could influence coverage requirements over time. What logistics leaders should be asking This is less about reacting to a single ruling and more about reassessing practices through a risk lens. Key questions include: Is our carrier selection process clearly defined and consistently followed? Do we rely on objective safety data in decision-making? Can we demonstrate we exercised reasonable care in selecting carriers? Where are our highest-risk third-party relationships? For many organizations, the answer won’t be to change the operating model. Brokers will likely continue to depend on third-party carriers to meet capacity needs. However, the expectation around how those relationships are managed will likely change. How CLA can help logistics companies with process improvements CLA works with logistics companies to evaluate and strengthen the processes supporting compliance, risk management, and operational efficiency. Whether you’re assessing your carrier selection procedures, reviewing documentation practices, or rethinking how risk is managed across your network, our team can help guide you. This blog contains general information and does not constitute the rendering of legal, accounting, investment, tax, or other professional services. Consult with your advisors regarding the applicability of this content to your specific circumstances. © 2026 CliftonLarsonAllen. All rights reserved. "CliftonLarsonAllen" and "CLA" refer to CliftonLarsonAllen LLP. Securities and investment advisory services are offered through CliftonLarsonAllen Wealth Advisors, LLC, an SEC-registered investment advisor, member FINRA/SIPC. CliftonLarsonAllen is a Minnesota LLP, with more than 120 locations across the United States. The Minnesota certificate number is 00963. The California license number is 7083. The Maryland permit number is 39235. The New York permit number is 64508. The North Carolina certificate number is 26858. If you have questions regarding individual license information, please contact Elizabeth Spencer . CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP), an independent legal entity, is a network member of CLA Global , an international organization of independent accounting and advisory firms. Each CLA Global network firm is a member of CLA Global Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee. CLA Global Limited does not practice accountancy or provide any services to clients. CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP) is not an agent of any other member of CLA Global Limited, cannot obligate any other member firm, and is liable only for its own acts or omissions and not those of any other member firm. Similarly, CLA Global Limited cannot act as an agent of any member firm and cannot obligate any member firm. The names “CLA Global” and/or “CliftonLarsonAllen,” and the associated logo, are used under license.