Nebraska Welcomes New Pipeline Route

Nov. 15, 2011
Gov. Dave Heinenman said he hopes the Keystone XL pipeline project will move forward as quickly as possible and disagrees with 'environmental leftists groups that oppose the pipeline no matter what.'

Nebraska's governor on Tuesday welcomed a controversial U.S.-Canada pipeline now that it will be rerouted away from the state's sensitive wetlands, but environmentalists vowed to keep up the fight.

Gov. Dave Heinenman said he hopes the Keystone XL pipeline project will move forward as quickly as possible and disagrees with "environmental leftists groups that oppose the pipeline no matter what."

"I supported the pipeline -- I opposed the route," Heinenman told reporters. "Now the route's going to change, we can go forward with the pipeline."

Pipeline operator TransCanada Corp. on Monday agreed to reroute the pipeline after Nebraska lawmakers introduced legislation aimed at protecting the state's Sand Hills area, which features important wetlands and a sensitive ecosystem.

The move came shortly after President Obama's administration delayed the project, saying it needs more time to assess the pipeline's environmental implications and warning that a final decision may not come until 2013.

The State Department last week said its move was based on specific concerns about the Sand Hills area, which is along the proposed pipeline route from Canada's Alberta province to refineries in Texas.

The decision to change the route will not change the department's "thorough, rigorous and transparent review process," spokesman Mark Toner said Monday.

Activists fear an accident along the 1,700-mile pipeline would be disastrous for aquifers in central Great Plains states.

Others oppose the $13 billion project because exploiting the tar sands requires energy that generates a large volume of greenhouse gases.

The National Resource Defense Council applauded Nebraska's victory in protecting the Sand Hills, and vowed to continue to oppose the project in order to protect the climate.

"Now we need TransCanada to listen to the American people tell them 'no' to the pipeline as a whole," Susan Casey-Lefkowitz, international program director, wrote in a blog post.

"What Nebraska will see is that there is no safe route for a leaky tar-sands pipeline through any of their farms and communities. And what the nation knows is that we can't fight climate change and build yet another tar-sands oil pipeline."

The environmental group Bold Nebraska also vowed to carry on the fight.

"We do not trust TransCanada. They have bullied and mislead landowners and citizens," founder Jane Kleeb said in a statement. "Because of that we will be watching them like a hawk to ensure our land and water are protected."

Copyright Agence France-Presse, 2011

Popular Sponsored Recommendations

Empowering the Modern Workforce: The Power of Connected Worker Technologies

March 1, 2024
Explore real-world strategies to boost worker safety, collaboration, training, and productivity in manufacturing. Emphasizing Industry 4.0, we'll discuss digitalization and automation...

How Organizations Connect and Engage with Frontline Workers

June 14, 2023
Nearly 80% of the 2.7 billion workers across manufacturing, construction, healthcare, transportation, agriculture, hospitality, and education are frontline. Learn best practices...

Transformative Capabilities for XaaS Models in Manufacturing

Feb. 14, 2024
The manufacturing sector is undergoing a pivotal shift toward "servitization," or enhancing product offerings with services and embracing a subscription model. This transition...

Shifting Your Business from Products to Service-Based Business Models: Generating Predictable Revenues

Oct. 27, 2023
Executive summary on a recent IndustryWeek-hosted webinar sponsored by SAP

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!