Chevron Claims Tribunal Support in Ecuador Fight

Feb. 28, 2012
Panel rejects move by Quito to halt the case.

Chevron Corp. on Feb. 28 claimed the backing of an international tribunal in its fight to prevent Ecuador from enforcing a pollution fine against it that could top $18 billion.

The panel at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague ruled that it has the jurisdiction to hear the oil giant's claims against Ecuador, rejecting Quito's move to halt the case.

In the latest legal step in the 19-year-old case over responsibility for oil exploration-related pollution in the Amazon region, the tribunal said that it was the right body to handle the case.

It based its ruling, issued Monday, on the U.S.-Ecuador Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT), which mandates an international tribunal for disputes relating to investments by U.S. firms in Ecuador.

Ecuador, hoping to enforce a domestic court's massive judgment last year against Chevron for pollution in the Amazon region dating back more than four decades, had argued that the BIT did not apply to the case.

Chevron was ordered by a domestic court last year to pay $8.6 billion for environmental damage in the Lago Agrio region allegedly caused by the oil operations of U.S. firm Texaco, which it acquired in 2001.

With added-on penalties since then, Chevron now faces as much as $18.2 billion in fines.

But Chevron has sought relief from the tribunal, insisting that the BIT is the correct venue and accusing Ecuador's domestic judicial system of fraud in handling the case.

"With today's decision, Chevron will proceed to the merits of its arbitration to hold Ecuador responsible for the fraud being committed through its judicial system," Hewitt Pate, Chevron vice president and general counsel, said in a statement.

Earlier in February the tribunal ordered Quito to prevent any enforcement domestically or internationally of the Ecuadoran court's damage claims, while the court in question rejected the ruling.

In Monday's decision, the tribunal said it will now begin to review the arguments in Chevron's case against Quito.

Karen Hinton, a U.S. spokeswoman for the Ecuadorans, called the tribunal decision "a non-event" that is "unenforceable and illegitimate."

"The members of this arbitration panel long ago lost their legitimacy by making so-called 'rulings' that stand in direct violation of international law," she said in a statement.

"The decision violates Ecuador's constitution and purports to quash the legal claims of thousands of citizens who face an imminent risk of death due to Chevron's toxic contamination of the rainforest."

Copyright Agence France-Presse, 2012

Popular Sponsored Recommendations

Turning Your Frontline Workforce into a Competitive Advantage: A Comprehensive Guide

Sept. 19, 2023
In this guide, we'll explore how manufacturers are using digital technologies to preserve the bottom line and maintain growth by enabling and empowering their #1 asset - their...

Are You Positioned To Tackle Supply Chain Risk?

Sept. 20, 2023
Supply chain disruption is here to stay, but you can keep ahead of potential issues — and identify new opportunities — by regularly assessing your suppliers. Download our supplier...

3D Printing a More Efficient Factory Floor

Nov. 16, 2023
Today’s additive manufacturing platforms make it simple to print a wide range of high-performing industrial parts as soon as possible and right where you need them — unlocking...

The Ultimate Ecommerce Excellence Checklist

Oct. 2, 2023
Scaling ecommerce operations is no easy task when your business is moving fast. Assess your current ecommerce maturity level and set optimization priorities with this practical...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!