Viewpoint -- Without DeLay

April 5, 2006
In Washington, D.C., the issue is a lack of leadership.

In Washington, D.C., this first full week of April, there was a reminder of how much attention is paid to personalities, sometimes to the detriment of issues. I am referring to former House majority leader Tom DeLay's announced departure from Congress. Dubbed "The Hammer" for his less-than-subtle manner of dealing with people, DeLay ultimately had relatively few defenders and a growing number of critics, not all of whom would go on-the-record to register their objections. However, as David Brooks, a columnist for the New York Times, has so astutely noted, the real issue is not DeLay but DeLayism, that collection of heavy-handed practices that do away with discussion and dissent, command blind loyalty and raise serious questions about ethics and legality.

There is no shortage of issues to be discussed in the continuing national debate about the proper roles of government. Among those issues are immigration, tax reform, Medicare's finances, China's protection of U.S. intellectual property, the Doha Round trade talks, the future of manufacturing, and national security. But there is a remarkable shortage of political leaders, the kind of people who can bring others, especially their fiercest critics, into discussions on those issues. Neither Republicans nor Democrats are distinguishing themselves by being leaders, although some of them gladly take that title. Neither the people in the White House nor those on Capitol Hill are demonstrating the kind of leadership that is based on principle, is a product of honest discussion and produces policy that can be faithfully defended and executed.

I sense among the nation's voters a growing feeling that the country would be better served if Tom DeLay weren't the only person making a dramatic exit this year from the capital city. But I wonder if voters are ready to go beyond their grumbling and carping. I wonder if they really care enough to enter into a discussion of issues during the next seven months and then vote in the November elections. Leadership of the kind I am writing about isn't only the province of people in Washington, D.C. It begins at the local level with individual voters. And it would be reassuring to see a return to it -- without delay.

Popular Sponsored Recommendations

How Manufacturers Can Optimize Operations with Weather Intelligence

Nov. 2, 2023
The bad news? Severe weather has emerged as one of the biggest threats to continuity and safety in manufacturing. The good news? The intelligence solutions that build weather ...

3D Printing a More Efficient Factory Floor

Nov. 16, 2023
Today’s additive manufacturing platforms make it simple to print a wide range of high-performing industrial parts as soon as possible and right where you need them — unlocking...

Food and Beverage 2024 Trends and Outlook for North America

Oct. 29, 2023
Ready to hear what 200 of your peers said are the top challenges and opportunities in 2024? Don’t fall behind. Uncover actionable insights to better prepare for 2024 in this whitepaper...

The Ultimate Ecommerce Excellence Checklist

Oct. 2, 2023
Scaling ecommerce operations is no easy task when your business is moving fast. Assess your current ecommerce maturity level and set optimization priorities with this practical...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!