Should India Lose Its US Duty-Free Status?

Jan. 24, 2013
“If India continues to prevent open access to their markets, the United States must take action to address measures that not only harm the U.S. and other foreign enterprises but also damage India’s own economy and the broader global trading system” notes Stephen Ezell, senior policy analyst with ITIF.

Yes, would be the answer from the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF).

Just a few days ago, Jan. 21, reports were circulating that India was preparing to exclude foreign information and communications technology  vendors from participating in the country’s $4 billion national optical fiber network project.

Last February the Indian Ministry of Communications and Information Technology announced a preferential market access mandate for electronic goods, which if implemented would require a large percentage of high-tech goods sold in India to be manufactured there.

The mandate means that a specified share of each product’s market—anywhere from 30% to possibly even 100%—would have to be filled by India-based manufacturers, with the local content share for each product rising over time. One of the goals is to have 80% of the computers and electronics sold in India be manufactured domestically by 2020.

This requirement is already being applied to public procurements

Those two, and other, anti-free trade moves have caused this group to call for the US to withdraw India’s Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) status, which provides duty-free entry to the U.S. for a variety of Indian products and services, if India does not rescind the measures.

“If India continues to prevent open access to their markets, the United States must take action to address measures that not only harm the U.S. and other foreign enterprises but also damage India’s own economy and the broader global trading system” notes Stephen Ezell, senior policy analyst with ITIF.

“These actions contravene GATT and WTO free trade provisions and will ultimately hurt Indian companies in the global market,” Ezell adds. “India can realize its goals and better attract globally mobile investment if it focuses on enacting a range of policies that enhance the underlying competitiveness of its economy and enterprises without disincentivizing international trade.”

For more information see Ezell’s blog post.

About the Author

Adrienne Selko Blog | Senior Editor

Focus: Expansion Management & the Biotech & Life Sciences Industries

Email: [email protected]

Follow Adrienne on Twitter: @ASelkoIW

Call: 216-931-9235

Senior Editor Adrienne Selko manages IndustryWeek’s Expansion Management, delivering ideas and information about how successful manufacturers leverage location to gain competitive advantage. She explores the strategies behind why companies located their headquarters, research institutes, factories, warehouse and distribution centers and other facilities where they did, and how they benefit from the decision.

Adrienne is also the editorial coordinator of the IndustryWeek Expansion Management Roundtable events, which unites economic development professionals to network and discuss the latest trends in site location.

As well, Adrienne tells the stories of successful companies in the biotechnology and life sciences industries.

In the past, Adrienne has managed IndustryWeek’s award-winning website, overseeing eNewletters, webinars, and contributed content. Before joining the staff, Adrienne was managing editor of corporate publications at a large regional financial institution. She also ran a public relations and marketing company that published a best-selling healthcare book.

Adrienne received a bachelor’s of business administration from the University of Michigan and is especially interested in wellness and natural health. 

Sponsored Recommendations

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of IndustryWeek, create an account today!