Supreme Court Rules Against Obama Recess Appointments

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday placed limits on the president's power to appoint high-level judges and officials while Congress is in recess, ruling that Barack Obama violated the Constitution.

In a keenly anticipated decision, the high court's nine justices invalidated three so-called "recess appointments" made by Obama in early 2012 when the Senate was holding only pro forma sessions every three days.

They said the Constitution "empowers the president to fill any existing vacancy during any recess -- intra-session or intersession -- of sufficient length."

But in a unanimous decision, the court said Obama had overstepped his authority in making the nominations to fill positions on the National Labor Relations Board.

"The president made the recess appointments before us during a break too short to count as recess under the (constitutional) Clause. And for that reason, the appointments are invalid," said Justice Stephen Breyer, who delivered the court's opinion.

The ruling was a victory for Obama's Republican rivals, who had accused him of trying to slip nominees past lawmakers in order to block the Senate's legal right to oppose them.

The issue had reached the court thanks to a lawsuit filed by the Noel Canning company, which contested the legitimacy of the NLRB appointments after the board ruled against it in a dispute.

"The recess appointments clause eliminates Senate approval in order that the president can ensure the continued functioning of the federal government when the Senate is away," Breyer said. "But it should not give power to the president to avoid Senate approval on a regular basis. We conclude that the phrase 'the recess' includes any recess of 10 or more days, whether it is an intra-session recess or an inter-session recess."

Republicans hailed the ruling.

"For too long, our president has operated by fiat, bypassing Congress and overriding the will of the American people," said Republican Senator John Cornyn. "Today's ruling sends a clear message against President Obama's power grabs and restores more constitutionally required accountability for all nominations going forward."

Copyright Agence France-Presse 2014